Harnett County Slammer, Articles D

at 294. . . The context included the fact that the ag was privately owned, that it was displayed on private property, and that there was no danger of breach of the peace. D-1206, 5-6-96; Ord. But cf. It does so, however, because of the groups past actions in the context of a specific dispute between real parties. There had been no similarly disruptive demonstrations by pro-abortion factions at the abortion clinic. . Be on Guard When a Stranger Knocks on Your Door: In Florida - LinkedIn If voted on for a second time in July, door-to-door sales and solicitation, including non-profits will only be allowed to visit homes in the City of Florence between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. Exclusion of various advocacy groups from participation in the Campaign was upheld as furthering reasonable governmental interests in offering a forum to traditional health and welfare charities, avoiding the appearance of governmental favoritism of particular groups or viewpoints, and avoiding disruption of the federal workplace by controversy.1482 The Court pinpointed the governments intention as the key to whether a public forum has been created: The government does not create a public forum by inaction or by permitting limited discourse, but only by intentionally opening a non-traditional forum for public discourse.1483 Under this categorical approach, the government has wide discretion in maintaining the nonpublic character of its forums, and may regulate in ways that would be impermissible were it to designate a limited public forum.1484, Application of these principles continues to raise often difficult questions. When consumers are in their own home, or someone else's home, they cannot walk away from a salesperson like they would be able to in a retail store. 1502 But see Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters, 436 U.S. U.S. 180 (1978). Police manhunt continues for suspect in Texas mass shooting It was in a labor case that the Court first held picketing to be entitled to First Amendment protection.1506 Striking down a at prohibition on picketing to inuence or induce someone to do something, the Court said: In the circumstances of our times the dissemination of information concerning the facts of a labor dispute must be regarded as within that area of free discussion that is guaranteed by the Constitution.